Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1993 17:02:03 -1000 From: lucifer@emx.cc.utexas.edu (Light-Bearer) Message-Id: <1v3jrbINN2jq@emx.cc.utexas.edu> Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas Subject: Camera motion and flow forms (was Re: Kite aerial photography (long)) In article <1ul0e3$433@werple.apana.org.au> alfa@werple.apana.org.au (Glenn Durden) writes: >rock@netcom.com (Anne Rock) writes: First, thanks to Anne for her article... very interesting. I always wanted to do photography fro a rocket, but never did. Photos fro kites sounds very exciting, but I definitely want to go into it well prepared. I didn't see Flow Forms mentioned for lifting. How do they perform? [deleted text] >Results: First roll of film was a failure. The antenna, which I had left >hanging straight down, I THOUGHT was out of view, but it ended up in most >shots. :-( Plus, I'd forgotten about the camera moving, and blurring the >pics. :-( >Second roll of film went great! None of the mistakes of the above, and a >friend has even asked me if I can take photos of his farm for him. :-) So how did you solve the camear motion and blurring problems? Thanks, Dean -- Q \ | Dean C. Hines, Astronomy | dhines@astro.as.utexas.edu | |-+=========|> | University of Texas | dhines@pan.as.utexas.edu | / \ _/ | Austin, TX 78712 | -----------------------------| -----------------| "No, it's not a spaceship, it's a Stunt Kite... sheesh! | = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1993 16:52:45 -1000 From: alfa@werple.apana.org.au (Glenn Durden) Message-Id: <1v67lt$86r@werple.apana.org.au> Organization: werple public-access unix, Melbourne Subject: Re: Camera motion and flow forms (was Re: Kite aerial photography (long)) lucifer@emx.cc.utexas.edu (Light-Bearer) writes: >I always wanted to do photography fro a rocket, but never did. Photos >fro kites sounds very exciting, but I definitely want to go into it >well prepared. >I didn't see Flow Forms mentioned for lifting. How do they perform? Cant say. I dont own one. >>Second roll of film went great! None of the mistakes of the above, and a >>friend has even asked me if I can take photos of his farm for him. :-) >So how did you solve the camear motion and blurring >problems? Same method as described in the original long article. Hand the camera >From a 'pendulum' that is long enough to be steady. Secondly, since I was taking the pictures by radio control (tripping the shutter this way), I was watching the kite, and only took pictures when I could see the camera was steady. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =